From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco To: Subject: Re: Jython dependencies... Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 21:57:00 -0000 Message-id: <15314.21942.373185.694667@fencer.cygnus.com> References: <200110180039.RAA06254@fencer.cygnus.com> <000201c1578a$997e9e40$5be6b4cd@cygnus.com> <15312.46970.217609.225728@fencer.cygnus.com> <87r8ryduz2.fsf@creche.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-10/msg00042.html Tom Tromey writes: > This must be specific to the particular program. With yesterday's > 3.1 tree, a static hello-world type program works fine. (I was > surprised by that.) Well, I linked statically so I could debug because I never managed to put my hands on a gdb to would let me debug dynamically linked Java apps. Knowing that the GC had a problem with -O2, I rebuilt it appropriately and started to debug to eventually get the same error the trace shows. Now the interesting thing is that before rebuilding the GC, jython would simply say something like `Aborted' but now the statically or dynamically linked version are printing the trace. I'm just going to try to rebuild the toolchain without any optimization, and we'll see. I tried to back Bryce's static ctor patch, but just going by the message he posted, I get sources that aren't building -- note that the upgrade after which jython would crash included that mod (and many others, of course.) ./A