From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24950 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2002 18:45:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rhug-rhats-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rhug-rhats-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24813 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2002 18:44:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2002 18:44:50 -0000 Received: from makita.cygnus.com (makita.sfbay.redhat.com [205.180.230.78]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA23450; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 10:44:43 -0800 (PST) Received: (apbianco@localhost) by makita.cygnus.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.6.4) id KAA24219; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 10:44:42 -0800 (PST) From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15450.57882.529199.270630@makita.cygnus.com> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 10:45:00 -0000 To: Jukka Santala Cc: Tom Tromey , rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: libtool woes In-Reply-To: References: <87zo2uid09.fsf@creche.redhat.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.62 under Emacs 19.34.1 Reply-To: apbianco@cygnus.com X-Organization: Red Hat, Sunnyvale CA, USA. X-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ X-Zippy: Yow! Is my fallout shelter termite proof? X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 Jukka Santala writes: > However, the GCC/GCJH patch still remains unapplied, and the version > I posted has already been conflicted by the CVS changes. Which is > becoming a pain. It is. All hunks are failing on a freshly updated tree. > I can post updated version of the patch, somebody else can merge it, Yes please. Don't include the ChangeLog entries as they often don't apply cleanly. Listing the ChangeLog entry and then the relevant hunks is the preferred form of patch submission (this is not the reason the patch wasn't applied in a timely fashion, BTW. We're all just really busy. Sorry about that.) ./A.