From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27498 invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2002 10:17:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rhug-rhats-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rhug-rhats-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27468 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2002 10:17:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO inauspicious.demon.co.uk) (193.237.142.182) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2002 10:17:53 -0000 Received: from slippy.wire.rat ([192.168.1.1]) by inauspicious.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 18QPdj-0002vq-00 for rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com; Mon, 23 Dec 2002 10:16:52 +0000 Received: from slippy.wire.rat (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.wire.rat (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gBNAGpBo028175 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2002 10:16:51 GMT Received: (from gary@localhost) by slippy.wire.rat (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id gBNAGoqT028173 for rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com; Mon, 23 Dec 2002 10:16:50 GMT Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 02:17:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: versions of sub-projects custumised for gcj Message-ID: <20021223101650.GA28098@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com References: <1040576364.2159.766.camel@escape> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1040576364.2159.766.camel@escape> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6646 CF68 DEA8 07CA CA64 C18C A150 FC2D 85A8 F78B X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 08:59:21AM -0800, Anthony Green wrote: > My suggestion is that we aim for a frozen rhug "release" that works > with GCC 3.3, which is supposed to be released in mid-February. We > should get Tomcat4 working for this release. > > Gary - how many more packages are required for Tomcat4? None, I'm just working my way through the errors until it works :) Actually, I have quite a lot of uncommitted stuff right now, which makes me a little uneasy. Would it be worth me importing my stuff as jakarta-servletapi-4 and jakarta-tomcat-4 (or similar)? It would allow others to play around with what I've done without trashing the current, working, jakarta-tomcat and jakarta-servletapi packages, Cheers, Gary [ gbenson@redhat.com ][ GnuPG 85A8F78B ][ http://inauspicious.org/ ]