From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21838 invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2002 16:14:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rhug-rhats-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rhug-rhats-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21811 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2002 16:14:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO inauspicious.demon.co.uk) (193.237.142.182) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2002 16:14:47 -0000 Received: from slippy.wire.rat ([192.168.1.1]) by inauspicious.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 18QVDu-0003iB-00 for rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com; Mon, 23 Dec 2002 16:14:34 +0000 Received: from slippy.wire.rat (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.wire.rat (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gBNGEYBo004266 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2002 16:14:34 GMT Received: (from gary@localhost) by slippy.wire.rat (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id gBNGEXav004264 for rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com; Mon, 23 Dec 2002 16:14:33 GMT Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 08:14:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: versions of sub-projects custumised for gcj Message-ID: <20021223161432.GH28098@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021223101650.GA28098@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6646 CF68 DEA8 07CA CA64 C18C A150 FC2D 85A8 F78B X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 ----- Forwarded message from Christophe Roux ----- Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 17:44:41 +0100 From: Christophe Roux To: Gary Benson Subject: Re: versions of sub-projects custumised for gcj On Monday 23 December 2002 11:16, you wrote: > On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 08:59:21AM -0800, Anthony Green wrote: > > My suggestion is that we aim for a frozen rhug "release" that works > > with GCC 3.3, which is supposed to be released in mid-February. We > > should get Tomcat4 working for this release. > > > > Gary - how many more packages are required for Tomcat4? > > None, I'm just working my way through the errors until it works :) > > Actually, I have quite a lot of uncommitted stuff right now, which > makes me a little uneasy. Would it be worth me importing my stuff as > jakarta-servletapi-4 and jakarta-tomcat-4 (or similar)? It would > allow others to play around with what I've done without trashing the > current, working, jakarta-tomcat and jakarta-servletapi packages, > > Cheers, > Gary > > [ gbenson@redhat.com ][ GnuPG 85A8F78B ][ http://inauspicious.org/ ] I say a little word, because I agree with Gary : Between 3.2.3 and 4.0 Tomcat has changed of servlet version from 2.2 to 2.3, so it is important to keep the two separate, in order not to have to modify older applications. Thanks Christophe