From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24379 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2003 15:11:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rhug-rhats-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rhug-rhats-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24371 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2003 15:11:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO inauspicious.demon.co.uk) (193.237.142.182) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 9 Jan 2003 15:11:26 -0000 Received: from slippy.wire.rat ([192.168.1.1]) by inauspicious.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 18WeKm-00074R-00 for rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 15:11:04 +0000 Received: from slippy.wire.rat (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.wire.rat (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h09FB36v012925 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 15:11:03 GMT Received: (from gary@localhost) by slippy.wire.rat (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id h09FB0p3012923 for rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 15:11:00 GMT Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 15:11:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com Subject: Tomcat 4 circular dependencies Message-ID: <20030109151100.GE2711@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6646 CF68 DEA8 07CA CA64 C18C A150 FC2D 85A8 F78B X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 Hi all, Tomcat 4 is split into two tarballs (core and connectors) but the split is a little messy resulting in a circular dependency between the two. To get a working catalina executable you need to compile the following bits of the two tarballs in the following order (non-relevant bits omitted): lib-org-apache-tomcat-util (connectors) lib-org-apache-catalina (core) [any connectors you want to use] (connectors) catalina executable (core) I think that the tidiest way to handle this would be to make one rhug package with both tarballs in it (perhaps as upstream/{core,conns}, or maybe upstream and upstream-conn). Does anybody know a better way and, if not, does anybody mind if I do this? Any preference as to the names of the upstream directories? Cheers, Gary [ gbenson@redhat.com ][ GnuPG 85A8F78B ][ http://inauspicious.org/ ]