From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24922 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2003 18:31:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rhug-rhats-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rhug-rhats-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24858 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2003 18:31:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO inauspicious.demon.co.uk) (193.237.142.182) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 13 Jan 2003 18:31:17 -0000 Received: from slippy.wire.rat ([192.168.1.1]) by inauspicious.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 18Y9MU-00036S-00 for rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:31:02 +0000 Received: from slippy.wire.rat (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.wire.rat (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h0DIV26v019963 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:31:02 GMT Received: (from gary@localhost) by slippy.wire.rat (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id h0DIV1V1019961 for rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:31:01 GMT Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:31:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Tomcat status Message-ID: <20030113183101.GR27614@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com References: <20030113172903.GP27614@redhat.com> <1042481919.1519.12.camel@escape> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1042481919.1519.12.camel@escape> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6646 CF68 DEA8 07CA CA64 C18C A150 FC2D 85A8 F78B X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 10:18:37AM -0800, Anthony Green wrote: > On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 09:29, Gary Benson wrote: > > I have before me a copy of Tomcat 4.1.12 built with gcj that is > > serving requests! Only static files so far, and only the WARP > > connector works, but you cannot know how happy I am! > > Excellent! Congratulations Gary. :) > What is preventing servlets from working? Oh, they're throwing some exception or another. I'm going to get what I have committed before continuing. > When it comes time to get jsp working, you might want to look at the > gcj compiler class I added to the old tomcat. On the other hand, > maybe this is completely different in tomcat4. I have a funny feeling that Tomcat 4 already has a gcj compiler class. I may have imagined it though... Cheers, Gary [ gbenson@redhat.com ][ GnuPG 85A8F78B ][ http://inauspicious.org/ ]