From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14272 invoked by alias); 21 May 2003 16:44:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rhug-rhats-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rhug-rhats-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14225 invoked from network); 21 May 2003 16:44:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO inauspicious.demon.co.uk) (193.237.142.182) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 May 2003 16:44:10 -0000 Received: from slippy.wire.rat ([192.168.1.1]) by inauspicious.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 19IWhE-0000Xt-00 for rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com; Wed, 21 May 2003 17:44:08 +0100 Received: from slippy.wire.rat (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.wire.rat (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h4LGi8LD013641 for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 17:44:08 +0100 Received: (from gary@localhost) by slippy.wire.rat (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h4LGi8gQ013639 for rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com; Wed, 21 May 2003 17:44:08 +0100 Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 16:44:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [tromey@redhat.com (Tom Tromey)] FAIL: rhug build on Sat May 3 03:26:43 MDT 2003 Message-ID: <20030521164407.GR31476@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com References: <87wuh7ptsu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1053502285.3465.9.camel@escape> <20030521093824.GE31476@redhat.com> <1053531968.3465.525.camel@escape> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1053531968.3465.525.camel@escape> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6646 CF68 DEA8 07CA CA64 C18C A150 FC2D 85A8 F78B X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 Anthony Green wrote: > On Wed, 2003-05-21 at 02:38, Gary Benson wrote: > > Hmmm, does this patch help? > > No - no change. what happens if you try: make upstream/src/org/apache/xerces/impl/msg/DOMMessages.properties.lo or make upstream/src/org/apache/xerces/impl/msg/DOMMessages.properties.o ?