From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rhug-rhats-return-349-listarch-rhug-rhats=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 30568 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2003 11:05:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact rhug-rhats-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rhug-rhats-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:rhug-rhats-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: rhug-rhats-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 30556 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2003 11:05:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO inauspicious.demon.co.uk) (193.237.142.182)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Jul 2003 11:05:31 -0000
Received: from slippy.wire.rat ([192.168.1.1])
	by inauspicious.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
	id 19holu-0000aw-00
	for rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:05:30 +0100
Received: from slippy.wire.rat (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by slippy.wire.rat (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h6UB5UvZ032744
	for <rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:05:30 +0100
Received: (from gary@localhost)
	by slippy.wire.rat (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h6UB5T8V032742
	for rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:05:29 +0100
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:05:00 -0000
From: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
To: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: New failure!
Message-ID: <20030730110529.GB32423@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com
References: <87fzkp4eah.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20030729142747.GH2821@redhat.com> <8765ll4dkd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20030729150628.GI2821@redhat.com> <87k7a12wyz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87k7a12wyz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6646 CF68 DEA8 07CA CA64  C18C A150 FC2D 85A8 F78B
X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2

Tom Tromey wrote:
> Gary> Yeah, but does "." correspond to srcdir or to builddir?
> 
> Sorry, "." is the build directory, since that is where `make' is run
> -- it is the directory containing the Makefile.
> 
> $(srcdir) is the corresponding source directory.
> 
> $(top_srcdir) is the source directory corresponding to the current
> top of tree -- it is the directory where the configure.in
> corresponding to this Makefile is located.

I committed a fix for xerces -- let me know if it works and I'll apply
it to the other packages that need it...