From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19009 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2003 15:41:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rhug-rhats-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rhug-rhats-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18992 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2003 15:41:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gary-benson.demon.co.uk) (80.177.162.128) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Sep 2003 15:41:43 -0000 Received: from slippy.wire.rat ([192.168.1.1]) by gary-benson.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1A4MdC-0002nM-00 for rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:41:42 +0100 Received: from slippy.wire.rat (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.wire.rat (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h8UFfgJD020510 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:41:42 +0100 Received: (from gary@localhost) by slippy.wire.rat (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h8UFfg8U020508 for rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:41:42 +0100 Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:41:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: merged-libs-branch Message-ID: <20030930154141.GE3407@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com References: <20030930110446.GC3407@redhat.com> <1064935327.3257.97.camel@escape> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1064935327.3257.97.camel@escape> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6646 CF68 DEA8 07CA CA64 C18C A150 FC2D 85A8 F78B X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 Anthony Green wrote: > On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 04:04, Gary Benson wrote: > > It all seems to work beautifully. Anyone mind if I merge the changes > > into HEAD? > > Sounds good to me. > > BTW - why isn't this kind of cross linking recommended? >From Uli: - the order in which the DSO constructors are called might be wrong. - it may not be possible to unload such a library. - even if it is, the destructors will not be run at dlclose() time. Gary