From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18690 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2003 13:43:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rhug-rhats-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rhug-rhats-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18682 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2003 13:43:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gary-benson.demon.co.uk) (80.177.162.128) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Nov 2003 13:43:24 -0000 Received: from slippy.wire.rat ([192.168.1.1]) by gary-benson.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1APiu4-0004io-00 for rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:43:24 +0000 Received: from slippy.wire.rat (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.wire.rat (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hASDhN0h023682 for ; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:43:23 GMT Received: (from gary@localhost) by slippy.wire.rat (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hASDhNtt023680 for rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:43:23 GMT Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:43:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: segfault when running ant Message-ID: <20031128134322.GB12877@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com References: <1070019719.27083.86.camel@ua-213-114-26-86.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se> <20031128120435.GA12877@redhat.com> <1070022488.27083.94.camel@ua-213-114-26-86.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1070022488.27083.94.camel@ua-213-114-26-86.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6646 CF68 DEA8 07CA CA64 C18C A150 FC2D 85A8 F78B X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00038.txt.bz2 Noa Resare wrote: > Backtrace is attached. I use the following versions which I believe are > the latest: > > [noa@molly bin]$ rpm -q gcc-ssa xerces-j ant > gcc-ssa-3.5ssa-0.20030801.43 > xerces-j-2.2.1-11 > ant-1.5.2-23 Indeed they are. > (gdb) bt [snip] Hmmm, looks like it's failing somewhere deep in libgcj. Do any of the gcj hackers here recognise it? Gary