From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24221 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2003 15:03:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rhug-rhats-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rhug-rhats-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24212 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2003 15:03:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gary-benson.demon.co.uk) (80.177.162.128) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Dec 2003 15:03:42 -0000 Received: from slippy.wire.rat ([192.168.1.1]) by gary-benson.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1AXMAH-0006MB-00 for rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:03:41 +0000 Received: from slippy.wire.rat (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.wire.rat (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBJF3f17016212 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:03:41 GMT Received: (from gary@localhost) by slippy.wire.rat (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hBJF3f6d016210 for rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:03:41 GMT Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:03:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [naoko] New Tomcat packages available Message-ID: <20031219150340.GD12896@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com References: <20031219140137.GC12896@redhat.com> <20031219143318.GA11028@raq465.uk2net.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031219143318.GA11028@raq465.uk2net.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6646 CF68 DEA8 07CA CA64 C18C A150 FC2D 85A8 F78B X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 Paul Nasrat wrote: > What is the time scale for these hitting rawhide? Early January. I want to split some subpackages out of xalan-j, mx4j and ant, and it'll take three times as long if I've already build them unsplit. > If not soon - could you at least build against fc1 + ssa, this would > open these packages up for testing in the fc2 cycle. To be honest I'd prefer to just go straight for FC2. I know it's ass, but it'll be quicker in the long run (hopefully!) Gary