Just wondering if anyone has tested this recently? I'm sure it was working on fc1/rawhide earlier - whilst building eclipse it segfaults. I've just rebuilt it and now I get libgcj failure: Duplicate class registration: org.xml.sax.ext.DeclHandler This exists in: libgcj-3.3.2.jar libgcj-3.5-tree-ssa.jar xerces-2.2.1.jar Any ideas I would have thought that the classloader should cope with multiple libraries on the classpath. Paul
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:29:52PM +0000, Paul Nasrat wrote: > Just wondering if anyone has tested this recently? > > > libgcj failure: Duplicate class registration: org.xml.sax.ext.DeclHandler I'm guessing I've been bitten by: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6819 I guess this mean I need to rebuild all of the naoko rpms under rawhide libgcj Paul
Paul Nasrat wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:29:52PM +0000, Paul Nasrat wrote:
> > Just wondering if anyone has tested this recently?
> >
> > libgcj failure: Duplicate class registration: org.xml.sax.ext.DeclHandler
>
> I'm guessing I've been bitten by:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6819
>
> I guess this mean I need to rebuild all of the naoko rpms under
> rawhide libgcj
The gcc-ssa rpms in Naoko do not have the XML classes, but the Fedora
gcc-ssa rpms do. Trying to solve this with linker settings is on my
todo list...
Gary
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 02:18:47PM +0000, Gary Benson wrote: > Paul Nasrat wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:29:52PM +0000, Paul Nasrat wrote: > > I guess this mean I need to rebuild all of the naoko rpms under > > rawhide libgcj > > The gcc-ssa rpms in Naoko do not have the XML classes, but the Fedora > gcc-ssa rpms do. Trying to solve this with linker settings is on my > todo list... Cool, well I'm rebuilding locally and going to see if I get any joy. Then to play with CNI and rpmlib Paul
>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Nasrat <pauln@truemesh.com> writes:
Paul> libgcj failure: Duplicate class registration: org.xml.sax.ext.DeclHandler
Just fyi, in the future this problem will go away as we move to the
new binary compatibility ABI. That doesn't solve the problem today
though :-(
Tom