From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3731 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2004 13:32:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rhug-rhats-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rhug-rhats-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3713 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2004 13:31:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ns1.truemesh.com) (216.127.66.98) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Feb 2004 13:31:54 -0000 Received: by ns1.truemesh.com (Postfix, from userid 503) id D43395DD1DF; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:26:20 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:32:00 -0000 From: Paul Nasrat To: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com Subject: RHUG/naoko and fc 2 test Message-ID: <20040213132619.GE15070@lichen.truemesh.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 >From rawhide reports I'm seeing a few naoko packages slipping into rawhide. Does this mean that the issues with linking ant and rawhide libgcj-ssa are resolved (ie the duplicate class issues for xml apis, etc). I tried a naoko rebuild recently (earlier in the week) on rawhide and was still having issues. If things are fixed any chance of pointing at patches or should I wait for things to trickle through rawhide. Cheers Paul