From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11569 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2003 17:28:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rhug-rhats-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rhug-rhats-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11561 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2003 17:28:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO grok.sabl.com) (216.99.207.39) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Sep 2003 17:28:48 -0000 Received: from sabl.com (nemo.sabl.com [192.168.2.3]) by grok.sabl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E96083D09; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:28:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F5CBC5C.6010609@sabl.com> Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 17:28:00 -0000 From: Bart Locanthi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030701 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en-gb, de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Green Cc: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: rhug status References: <3F5B766B.7020400@sabl.com> <1063036793.3495.9.camel@escape> <3F5CB32B.3060203@sabl.com> <1063040272.3495.22.camel@escape> <3F5CB782.5090203@sabl.com> <1063041450.3495.29.camel@escape> In-Reply-To: <1063041450.3495.29.camel@escape> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 ahhh.. this is my bad. with the dependency issue that seemed to be there (the build immediately failed on gnu.readline, perhaps because of objdir==srcdir), i wrote my own makefiles and didn't set that flag. btw the art of efficiently making gcj targets seems to elude both make and ant. is there a best standard practice for this? i understand the intent of using traditional .java->.class via make to bootstrap, but the ant stage of doing it en masse (yay!) still leaves the issue of generating .o's, which is almost as slow as going straight to .o from .java. i've taken to having rules like below and loading the few resulting .o's. gcj -c -o dir.o -classpath dir `find dir -name '*.java'` you need a slightly more complex thing when other classpath entries are necessary. Anthony Green wrote: >On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 10:08, Bart Locanthi wrote: > > >>gcj has been barfing on stuff in comments in BCEL and xalan. in the >>former, the literature reference symbol (as in $3.5.2 where $ is >>replaced by something that looks like a line integral), in the latter, >>stuff like u-umlaut in Fahrfergnugen. i elided these rather clumsily so >>i have no line numbers for you. >> >> > >This shouldn't be happening. Do you see --encoding=8859_1 on the >compile line? And you say this is with GCC 3.3.1 on a RHL9 machine? >How did you configure the compiler when you built it? > >BTW, I just checked in a fix for the jakarta-regexp classpath problem in >Xalan. > >Thanks, > >AG > > >