From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21175 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2002 19:26:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rhug-rhats-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rhug-rhats-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21091 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2002 19:26:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gash2.peakpeak.com) (207.174.178.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Feb 2002 19:26:27 -0000 Received: from creche.cygnus.com (ta0202.peakpeak.com [204.144.244.202]) by gash2.peakpeak.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA13122; Sat, 9 Feb 2002 12:23:12 -0700 Received: (from tromey@localhost) by creche.cygnus.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA05858; Sat, 9 Feb 2002 12:45:14 -0700 To: apbianco@cygnus.com Cc: Jukka Santala , rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: libtool woes References: <87zo2uid09.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <15450.57882.529199.270630@makita.cygnus.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom X-Zippy: Yow! I'm having a quadraphonic sensation of two winos alone in a steel mill! Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 11:26:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Alexandre Petit-Bianco's message of "Fri, 1 Feb 2002 10:44:42 -0800 (PST)" Message-ID: <87k7tmwib9.fsf@creche.redhat.com> X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.5 X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Alex" == Alexandre Petit-Bianco writes: Alex> Yes please. Don't include the ChangeLog entries as they often Alex> don't apply cleanly. Listing the ChangeLog entry and then the Alex> relevant hunks is the preferred form of patch submission (this Alex> is not the reason the patch wasn't applied in a timely fashion, Alex> BTW. We're all just really busy. Sorry about that.) FWIW, I use a couple of programs from Alexandre Oliva that make it so that I can handle patches that include the ChangeLog. His programs are so useful that now I prefer patches with the ChangeLog included, since it is less work for me. Tom