* auto* versions
@ 2003-01-30 2:24 Tom Tromey
2003-01-30 6:01 ` Anthony Green
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2003-01-30 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rhug-rhats
I noticed the top-level rhug Makefile.in was built using automake 1.5.
That is an obsolete version, and an unfortunately buggy one at that.
Let's standardize on something newer, like 1.7.2. What do you think?
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: auto* versions
2003-01-30 2:24 auto* versions Tom Tromey
@ 2003-01-30 6:01 ` Anthony Green
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Green @ 2003-01-30 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: rhug-rhats
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 18:16, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I noticed the top-level rhug Makefile.in was built using automake 1.5.
> That is an obsolete version, and an unfortunately buggy one at that.
> Let's standardize on something newer, like 1.7.2. What do you think?
I suppose we could try. To be honest, I'm afraid to touch any of this
because it seems so fragile (we're using a hacked libtool, for
instance). I may have some time in the next week to try this.
My plan was to not touch any of this until your new build tool was
ready. half-:-)
AG
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-30 6:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-30 2:24 auto* versions Tom Tromey
2003-01-30 6:01 ` Anthony Green
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).