From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31084 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2004 02:42:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rhug-rhats-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rhug-rhats-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30916 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2004 02:42:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ops2.one-point.com) (216.234.116.146) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Feb 2004 02:42:12 -0000 Received: from localhost (jsturm@localhost) by ops2.one-point.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1H2gDO31673; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:42:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 02:42:00 -0000 From: Jeff Sturm To: Leslie Rohde cc: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: where goith the static libs? In-Reply-To: <402D1BA6.8000404@optitext.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Leslie Rohde wrote: > In my setup, it appears that the building of static libs > is enabled, and the .o files are indeed in the tree, but > only .so and .la are put in .libs. Last I checked, rhug uses a broken libtool configuration. http://sources.redhat.com/ml/rhug-rhats/2002-12/msg00031.html Jeff