From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rhug-rhats-return-141-listarch-rhug-rhats=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 21061 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2002 13:02:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact rhug-rhats-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rhug-rhats-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:rhug-rhats-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: rhug-rhats-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 20988 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2002 13:02:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO tml-gw.tml.hut.fi) (130.233.44.1)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2002 13:02:42 -0000
Received: (from smap@localhost)
	by tml-gw.tml.hut.fi (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA25621
	for <rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com>; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 15:00:11 +0200
Received: from mail.tml.hut.fi(130.233.45.70) by tml-gw.tml.hut.fi via smap (V2.0)
	id xma025615; Fri, 1 Feb 02 15:00:01 +0200
Received: from morphine.tml.hut.fi (morphine.tml.hut.fi [130.233.45.7])
	by mail.tml.hut.fi (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g11D2T820841;
	Fri, 1 Feb 2002 15:02:29 +0200 (EET)
Received: from localhost (jsantala@localhost)
	by morphine.tml.hut.fi (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA01282;
	Fri, 1 Feb 2002 15:02:29 +0200 (EET)
X-Authentication-Warning: morphine.tml.hut.fi: jsantala owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 05:02:00 -0000
From: Jukka Santala <jsantala@tml.hut.fi>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
cc: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: libtool woes
In-Reply-To: <87zo2uid09.fsf@creche.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.10.10202011457110.1218-100000@morphine.tml.hut.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2

On 31 Jan 2002, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Jukka" == Jukka Santala <jsantala@tml.hut.fi> writes:
> Jukka> Ps. some of the Makefile.am's even call "gcj" straight instead of
> Jukka> $(GCJ)...
> I noticed many of them set GCJFLAGS.
> This is wrong; they should set AM_GCJFLAGS instead.
> GCJFLAGS is a user variable.

Yeah, none appear to use AM_GCJFLAGS, and practically all use GCJFLAGS.
However, the GCC/GCJH patch still remains unapplied, and the version I
posted has already been conflicted by the CVS changes. Which is becoming a
pain. What's the recommended course of action? I can post updated version
of the patch, somebody else can merge it, or I suppose I could take CVS
write access.

 -Jukka Santala