public inbox for sid@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Cc: sid@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: sid debugger interface extension: step out-of-range packet support
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 19:28:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020222222851.A17206@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C76E8F3.673C6559@redhat.com>; from msnyder@redhat.com on Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 04:57:23PM -0800

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 937 bytes --]

Hi -

msnyder wrote:
> [...]
> Thanks for pointing out this problem, which is in fact
> more severe than you think.
> 
> A quick experiment reveals that if you 
>   1) put a breakpoint at the beginning of line N
>   2) put a second breakpoint in the MIDDLE of line N
>   3) attempt to step over line N
> the second breakpoint will not be hit.

Interesting, but at least it's an unusual debugging
usage scenario.


> And in fact, if you have a multi-threaded program, 
> all threads will have the opportunity to run (if they
> are runnable), and NONE of them will hit ANY breakpoints
> while we are executing line N.  This will give threads
> the opportunity to "run away".

No, I think that's only if the other threads all happen also
to be executing the same line N.  If any passes outside, then
the step-out-of-range process would abort, as the 'e' packet
is no more thread-specific than 's' is.


- FChE

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2002-02-23  3:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-12 14:14 Frank Ch. Eigler
2002-02-12 22:10 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-13  7:13   ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2002-02-13 12:52     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-22 17:08     ` Michael Snyder
2002-02-22 17:05 ` Michael Snyder
2002-02-22 19:28   ` Frank Ch. Eigler [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020222222851.A17206@redhat.com \
    --to=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
    --cc=sid@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).