From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27045 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2004 19:56:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sid-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: sid-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27021 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2004 19:56:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Mar 2004 19:56:51 -0000 Received: from toenail.toronto.redhat.com (toenail.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.211]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E01E80008E; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 14:56:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from toenail.toronto.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by toenail.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i2MJunHl026084; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 14:56:49 -0500 Received: (from fche@localhost) by toenail.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2MJungX026082; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 14:56:49 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:56:00 -0000 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Dave Brolley Cc: sid@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch][rfa] Multi core debugging with GDB Message-ID: <20040322195648.GC25582@redhat.com> References: <405F4067.5020302@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <405F4067.5020302@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-q1/txt/msg00046.txt.bz2 Hi - brolley wrote: > [...] > 3) Even after proper notfication and yielding were implemented, the > packets never reached their GDB clients because their socket components > were never polled again [...] Looks good overall. For this part (socketio fini), you might consider having a brief loop to encourage all enqueued data to go out. - FChE