From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16737 invoked by alias); 8 May 2004 20:06:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sid-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: sid-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16730 invoked from network); 8 May 2004 20:06:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 May 2004 20:06:06 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i48K660m020488 for ; Sat, 8 May 2004 16:06:06 -0400 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i48K66v30393; Sat, 8 May 2004 16:06:06 -0400 Received: from touchme.toronto.redhat.com (IDENT:postfix@touchme.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.9]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i48K65cU018133; Sat, 8 May 2004 16:06:05 -0400 Received: from tooth.toronto.redhat.com (tooth.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.29]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B91800087; Sat, 8 May 2004 16:06:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tooth.toronto.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tooth.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i48K5s3h003587; Sat, 8 May 2004 16:05:54 -0400 Received: (from fche@localhost) by tooth.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i48K5rAj003584; Sat, 8 May 2004 16:05:53 -0400 Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 20:06:00 -0000 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Robert Cragie Cc: sid@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Patch to fix init_disassemble_info linking Message-ID: <20040508200553.GD3248@redhat.com> References: <200405081156.25435.rcc@jennic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200405081156.25435.rcc@jennic.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-q2/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 Hi - On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 11:56:25AM +0100, Robert Cragie wrote: > This patch, along the lines of what Frank was suggesting, seems to fix the > build - not tried running it though. [...] Thanks much for the patch; I am committing a slight variant of it in your name. - FChE