From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sid-return-923-listarch-sid=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 20235 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2005 18:00:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact sid-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:sid-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/sid/>
List-Post: <mailto:sid@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:sid-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: sid-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 19728 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2005 17:59:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2005 17:59:54 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j17HxsoF031782;
	Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:59:54 -0500
Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j17HxmO32379;
	Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:59:49 -0500
Received: from touchme.toronto.redhat.com (IDENT:postfix@touchme.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.9])
	by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j17Hxm7l018730;
	Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:59:48 -0500
Received: from toenail.toronto.redhat.com (toenail.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.211])
	by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7AD6F800001; Mon,  7 Feb 2005 12:59:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from toenail.toronto.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by toenail.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.12.5) with ESMTP id j17HxmiW022138;
	Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:59:48 -0500
Received: (from fche@localhost)
	by toenail.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j17HxlOW022137;
	Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:59:48 -0500
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:00:00 -0000
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Cc: cgen@sources.redhat.com, sid@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFC: fixup.scm -> guile.scm, update sid
Message-ID: <20050207175947.GA5011@redhat.com>
References: <vt2r7jsjlvi.fsf@zenia.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <vt2r7jsjlvi.fsf@zenia.home>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-SW-Source: 2005-q1/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2


--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-length: 367

Hi -


jimb wrote:

> [I'd posted this earlier, as two separate messages, but it seems to
> have been swallowed.]
>
> I need review from both SID and CGEN folks for this.
> [...]

Why?  It seemed like a pretty obvious change, especially on the sid side.

You're doing fine - go ahead and make your changes; we'll keep an
eye out for something objectionable.


- FChE

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-length: 189

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCB6yTVZbdDOm/ZT0RAqhYAJ4y8Z//aZmtGaX7XGeT59c8bOMw1ACfXCBp
9Bzy1Mz2v69yNoUeq/V2RaI=
=4bs2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G--