From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28782 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2006 19:57:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 28774 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jun 2006 19:57:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:57:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5QJvJYB020379 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 15:57:19 -0400 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5QJvIE5031427; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 15:57:18 -0400 Received: from touchme.toronto.redhat.com (IDENT:postfix@touchme.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.9]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k5QJvIve017874; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 15:57:18 -0400 Received: from ton.toronto.redhat.com (ton.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.15]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5A4800086; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 15:57:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ton.toronto.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ton.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k5QJvIZt017399; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 15:57:18 -0400 Received: (from fche@localhost) by ton.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k5QJvIU4017398; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 15:57:18 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:57:00 -0000 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Dave Brolley Cc: sid@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch][rfa] --gprof Performance Improvement Message-ID: <20060626195718.GB913@redhat.com> References: <44A03979.2050108@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44A03979.2050108@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact sid-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: sid-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2 Hi - > [...] > Comments? OK to commit? Nicely done, thanks. (If backward compatibility was at all a concern, the gprof component could have a new "sample" pin that assumes the pin-based PC traffic, instead of changing the current interface. But I agree that the old interface is not worth saving.) Was the string conversion stuff obvious in profiling output? - FChE