From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32261 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2007 22:27:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 32253 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Feb 2007 22:27:33 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Feb 2007 22:27:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l12MRMEZ031474; Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:27:22 -0500 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l12MRHdg024990; Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:27:17 -0500 Received: from touchme.toronto.redhat.com (IDENT:postfix@touchme.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.9]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l12MRHSG001815; Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:27:17 -0500 Received: from ton.toronto.redhat.com (ton.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.15]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92AE78001CA; Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:27:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from ton.toronto.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ton.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l12MRGb2008921; Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:27:16 -0500 Received: (from fche@localhost) by ton.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id l12MRGkL008920; Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:27:16 -0500 Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 22:27:00 -0000 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: hadipurnawan satria Cc: SID public developers Subject: Re: SID Comparisons Message-ID: <20070202222715.GH14417@redhat.com> References: <970bde210702012111n46c9836dx9b60a95a4c9d5fac@mail.gmail.com> <20070202164552.GF14417@redhat.com> <970bde210702021413y25c11557l28cd5ddcf739ea41@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <970bde210702021413y25c11557l28cd5ddcf739ea41@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact sid-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: sid-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 Hi - > Okay, just a little bit more. Is there any hard statistic like for > example i read somewhere in the milis archive someone mentioned > about 1000MIPS performance or something? Numbers like that depend on too many factors to answer simply. sid is highly configurable, and some options allow trading off between performance, debuggability, simplicity. > And maybe some opinion about what makes SID stands up against the > others. Sorry, that sort of comparison will be up to you. A key part of making such a paper interesting coming up with different axes along which the tools may be compared. An overall "winner" is very rare. > I mean, in my report i have to somehow shows that SID is relatively > better in comparison. We'll of be glad if that comes out as your conclusion, but you certainly shouldn't pre-judge. I'm sure we'd be curious to read your paper when it's finished, so please don't forget to send a link! - FChE