From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22839 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2008 16:42:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 22830 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Oct 2008 16:42:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:41:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9AGfuvc001033 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:41:56 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m9AGftk3019960 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:41:55 -0400 Received: from ton.toronto.redhat.com (ton.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.16.15]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9AGftZZ008985; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:41:55 -0400 Received: from ton.toronto.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ton.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m9AGfsJ0011225; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:41:54 -0400 Received: (from fche@localhost) by ton.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id m9AGfsIG011224; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:41:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:42:00 -0000 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien?= Buhrig Cc: "'Dave Brolley'" , sid@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: timings in sid Message-ID: <20081010164154.GG13646@redhat.com> References: <20080917134417.GA8858@redhat.com> <48EE2FD9.1040708@redhat.com> <001f01c92af5$32826410$97872c30$@Buhrig@tiempo-ic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <001f01c92af5$32826410$97872c30$@Buhrig@tiempo-ic.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact sid-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: sid-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q4/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 Hi - On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 06:28:15PM +0200, Aurélien Buhrig wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > [...] > BTW, are there only the MEP and SH platforms which correctly handle > execution time and can be used with peripherals in SID? Those are the ones where instruction timing is calculated from the model. For your model, you can calculate it yourself any way you like, as long as you use the same signaling convention (pin data value being sent back to the scheduler) to indicate the amount of time taken by the current instruction (sequence). - FChE