From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19005 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2003 18:09:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sid-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: sid-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18998 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2003 18:09:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Oct 2003 18:09:34 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (to-dhcp22.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.122]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E9080040B; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:09:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F957649.3040209@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 18:09:00 -0000 From: Dave Brolley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: sid@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch][rfa] "active" pin of sid-sched References: <3F956986.6010803@redhat.com> <20031021172825.GF19126@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20031021172825.GF19126@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-q4/txt/msg00018.txt.bz2 Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: >Hi - > > > >>This patch modifies the sid-sched compont so that it only drives its >>'active' pin when the threshold from being active to inactive is >>crossed. >> >> > >The existing ".recall()" check is already intended to do that, no? > Ahhh, yes. You are correct. I recall now (no pun intended) that we had discussed this earlier and you had suggested the recall method as a better implementation. Sorry for any confusion. Dave