From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12676 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2007 20:01:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 12608 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Feb 2007 20:01:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:01:10 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l16K18UW015719 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 15:01:08 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l16K17jx013951 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 15:01:08 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (vpn-14-186.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.186]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l16K13hn024521; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 15:01:06 -0500 Message-ID: <45C8DE7E.1040105@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:01:00 -0000 From: Dave Brolley User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Brolley CC: sid@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch][rfc] Remove 'throw()' Specifiers from Virtual Destructors in the SID API References: <45AD3167.2020403@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <45AD3167.2020403@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact sid-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: sid-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 This patch has now been committed. Dave Brolley wrote: > Hi, > > There is a SID port to the Toshiba Media Processor (MeP), which I will > be submitting very soon. Toshiba has their own simulator for this > target and it has an API which allows programmers to add their own > devices to the simulation. Toshiba required that the SID port for this > target also implement this API and support existing code written > against it. ... > Now, specifying throw() on a destructor is a minor optimization > opportunity at best, so it is preprosed that these specifiers be > removed from the SID API in order to allow extension of the SID API to > match that of other existing APIs, like Toshiba's. >