From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: matthew green <mrg@cygnus.com>
To: Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>
Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>, cgen@sources.redhat.com, sid@sources.redhat.com
Subject: re: branch probability hinting 
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 17:04:00 -0000
Message-id: <7643.983408654@cygnus.com>
References: <3A9D9D66.71176AB@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-q1/msg00076.html

   matthew green wrote:
   > 
   > i like this, but i don't like the name very much.  in NetBSD,
   > we've added predict_true() and predict_false().
   
   Well, builtin is the default name for compiler um.. well.. builtins. 
   It's been around for a while.

uh, i mean, we define predict_true() to make use of this feature :-)
   
   Unless you meant the name that Frank chose, yeah, it could be better. 
   Personally, I like expect as a name for it, tells you what you are
   telling the compiler to expect to happen.

i don't really care much either way, but "UNLIKELY" is very ugly to me.


.mrg.