public inbox for sid@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [libiberty] xmalloc cannot return NULL
@ 2013-10-14 17:59 Marc Glisse
  2013-10-14 18:04 ` Mike Frysinger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marc Glisse @ 2013-10-14 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sid, newlib, gdb-patches, binutils, gcc-patches

Hello,

libiberty provides a function xmalloc that never returns NULL. However, 
there are some hints that it might be ok if someone wants to supply their 
own xmalloc that can return NULL (though that would break a lot of things, 
including in libiberty itself).

I would like to remove that freedom, and the point of this email (I hope 
it doesn't bounce from too many of these addresses) is to ask all 
libiberty users if that would cause problems for them. I already heard 
from gcc and gdb that they are happy forbidding a null return value from 
xmalloc.

Why do I want to do that? I just added an attribute "returns_nonnull" to 
gcc and would like to mark relevant functions, to let the compiler 
optimize based on this property.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg00817.html

-- 
Marc Glisse

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-10-14 18:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-10-14 17:59 [libiberty] xmalloc cannot return NULL Marc Glisse
2013-10-14 18:04 ` Mike Frysinger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).