From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28345 invoked by alias); 10 May 2004 23:15:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sid-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: sid-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28332 invoked from network); 10 May 2004 23:15:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.224.249) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 May 2004 23:15:01 -0000 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BNJzA-0005su-00 for ; Tue, 11 May 2004 01:15:00 +0200 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 May 2004 01:15:00 +0200 Received: from bje by ozlabs.org with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 May 2004 01:15:00 +0200 To: sid@sources.redhat.com From: Ben Elliston Subject: Re: [patch] Better checking for cache line state Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 23:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <200405102156.i4ALuNcU015081@pobox.toronto.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ozlabs.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 X-SW-Source: 2004-q2/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 "Dave Brolley" writes: > On the target I'm working on, the programmer can directly write into > the cache tags. This requires more vigilance regarding the state of > the cache tags. Specifically, we should check the result of valid_p > () before using the tag. Looks good, Dave. Thanks, Ben