From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sid-return-781-listarch-sid=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 27819 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2004 00:00:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact sid-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:sid-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/sid/>
List-Post: <mailto:sid@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:sid-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: sid-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 27684 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2004 00:00:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.224.249)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2004 00:00:16 -0000
Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BGo75-000122-00
	for <sid@sources.redhat.com>; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 02:00:15 +0200
Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <sid@sources.redhat.com>; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 02:00:15 +0200
Received: from bje by ozlabs.org with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <sid@sources.redhat.com>; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 02:00:15 +0200
To: sid@sources.redhat.com
From: Ben Elliston <bje@au.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Which library for new target specific component?
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:00:00 -0000
Message-ID: <s9rfzavmuuk.fsf@fs.ozlabs.ibm.com>
References: <4087E58C.3000504@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ozlabs.org
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
X-SW-Source: 2004-q2/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2

Dave Brolley <brolley@redhat.com> writes:

> I'm implementing a very specific cache implementation for a target
> we're working on. The component will be abstracted from the current
> cache_component class in sid/components/cache (i.e. it will inherit
> from this class). Which library should this new class belong to?
> Currently I have it in libXXXfamily.la, built from
> sid/components/family/XXX. The effect of this is that libcache.la
> must be loaded before libXXXfamily.la. Should I instead add the code
> to libcache.la (sid/components/cache) so that the libraries are
> independent?

Good question.  I think putting it in libcache is fine for the time
being.  Presumably it will be some time before the code is contributed
to the public sources?

Ben