From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28342 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2004 17:33:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sid-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: sid-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28335 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2004 17:33:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.home) (12.223.225.216) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Jan 2004 17:33:46 -0000 Received: by zenia.home (Postfix, from userid 5433) id CA919208FF; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:32:34 -0500 (EST) To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: sid@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: replace cpu_trace_stream subclass with rdbuf swap References: <20040122124853.GA28974@redhat.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 17:33:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20040122124853.GA28974@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-q1/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 "Frank Ch. Eigler" writes: > > It builds, but I haven't tested it. The original patch was developed > > on an internal Red Hat branch and tested against an internal Red Hat > > cpu. > > Does this version of the code run on that internal port? Yes --- it works with no redirection, with redirection to a file, with redirection to one file and then another file (the first file gets just the "start of trace" line, but is then empty), and redirection to a file and then back to cout. > > The full SID takes an awful long time to build, and I'm not sure what > > toolchain and BSP to match it against. Do folks here have any advice > > on how to pare down the SID build and which architecture to target to > > test this with as little fuss as possible? > > The usual tricks are to configure sid with a single simple --target (say > m32r-elf), with --disable-shared to omit shared library building, and > build with CXXFLAGS excluding -O2 for a quicker compilation run. Thanks --- I'll give that a try.