From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sid-return-1007-listarch-sid=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 3652 invoked by alias); 4 Jul 2005 15:02:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact sid-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:sid-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/sid/>
List-Post: <mailto:sid@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:sid-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: sid-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 3597 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Jul 2005 15:02:24 -0000
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 15:02:24 +0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j64F2N3J020328
	for <sid@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 4 Jul 2005 11:02:23 -0400
Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j64F2MV02834;
	Mon, 4 Jul 2005 11:02:22 -0400
Received: from touchme.toronto.redhat.com (IDENT:postfix@touchme.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.9])
	by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j64F2M1M032193;
	Mon, 4 Jul 2005 11:02:22 -0400
Received: from toenail.toronto.redhat.com (toenail.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.211])
	by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 581DA800108; Mon,  4 Jul 2005 11:02:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from toenail.toronto.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by toenail.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.12.5) with ESMTP id j64F2Mpe003990;
	Mon, 4 Jul 2005 11:02:22 -0400
Received: (from fche@localhost)
	by toenail.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j64F2LoL003987;
	Mon, 4 Jul 2005 11:02:21 -0400
To: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
Cc: sid@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: sid doesn't build with gcc 4.0.x
References: <20050630172848.GA4491@redhat.com>
	<20050630202058.GA7997@redhat.com> <20050701104534.GA25446@redhat.com>
X-Hashcash: 1:20:050704:aldyh@redhat.com::DAM6ND/2CU2p3hkt:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003u80
X-Hashcash: 1:20:050704:sid@sources.redhat.com::lKNGtyAztGzE2A7x:00000000000000000000000000000000000000054ue
From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 15:02:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20050701104534.GA25446@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <y0mzmt2d37m.fsf@toenail.toronto.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2005-q3/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2


aldyh wrote:

> [...]
> I just checked the new snapshot, and gcc40 has more regressions on
> a "make check-sid", than when compiled with 34.  

Do you have a diff of the two test results?

> Could a cgen savvy person take a look?

By the way, you're mistakenly conflating cgen and sid.
These are all sid issues.

- FChE