* libiberty?
@ 2000-09-25 14:20 Ben Elliston
2000-09-25 14:24 ` libiberty? Syd Polk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ben Elliston @ 2000-09-25 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sourcenav
Now that S-N is licensed under the GPL, can we link the hyper
interpreter with libiberty to remove our custom copies of things like
getopt? There are other C functions in the libutils directory that I
think could be efficiently implemented in Tcl.
Ben
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: libiberty?
2000-09-25 14:20 libiberty? Ben Elliston
@ 2000-09-25 14:24 ` Syd Polk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Syd Polk @ 2000-09-25 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Elliston, sourcenav
At 04:55 PM 9/25/00 -0400, Ben Elliston wrote:
>Now that S-N is licensed under the GPL, can we link the hyper
>interpreter with libiberty to remove our custom copies of things like
>getopt? There are other C functions in the libutils directory that I
>think could be efficiently implemented in Tcl.
>
>Ben
Yes. We can now use libiberty. I would hold off doing this until we get 5.0
out the door, however.
Syd Polk spolk@redhat.com
Engineering Manager +1 415 777 9810 x 241
Red Hat, Inc.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-09-25 14:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-09-25 14:20 libiberty? Ben Elliston
2000-09-25 14:24 ` libiberty? Syd Polk
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).