From: Larry Stabile <lstabile@concord.com>
To: sourcenav@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [presales+tim.w@redhat.com: Re: Source Navigator]
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 05:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200011291330.IAA27681@sandbox.concord.com> (raw)
Is there anything you can tell me about the questions below? Thanks.
Larry Stabile
Concord Communications, Inc.
600 Nickerson Road
Marlborough, MA 01752
lstabile@concord.com
508-303-4246
------- Start of forwarded message -------
Sender: tim@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 06:54:56 -0800
Organization: Red Hat
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: Source Navigator
References: <md5:96C89D43ACB5592CC36E25E1BD3A7D4B>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "tim.w" <presales+tim.w@redhat.com>
To: presales+lstabile+concord.com@redhat.com
X-Mailgate-Version: Mailgate v1.3
Content-Length: 1520
> I tried Source Navigator 4.5.2 and it looks pretty good.
>
> We have a source base of 1M+ lines of C++ code, so it takes awhile to
> create a project database. I would like to be able to operate in the
> following way:
>
> 1. Make an initial source pass.
>
> 2. Schedule a nightly job to update the project database.
>
> 3. Allow developers to see this "master" project database
> read-only from their desktop systems by accessing the shared
> project database and source code.
>
> We use Clearcase as our source control system.
>
> The main question I have right now is whether the project database can
> be updated incrementally -- i.e., by checking file modification times
> or other methods. It would be expensive for us to scan the whole
> source tree each night.
>
> Also, please comment on whether you think the above sharing
> methodology is feasible. Note that I don't need a system right now
> which can share a main database and incrementally update local
> changes on developer's destktop machines. The main use of this will be
> to give people a way to browse the general source structure, not as an
> up-to-the-minute development tool.
Larry,
I have forwarded your concerns to the Source Navigator people. They can
be contacted at...
sourcenav@sources.redhat.com
...if you have any other questions about Source Navigator.
Thank you,
- --
Tim W. | "I don't care to belong to a club that
Red Hat Presales | accepts people like me as members."
| --Grocho Marx
------- End of forwarded message -------
next reply other threads:[~2000-11-29 5:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-29 5:30 Larry Stabile [this message]
2000-11-29 18:45 ` Syd Polk
2000-11-29 19:59 ` Larry Stabile
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200011291330.IAA27681@sandbox.concord.com \
--to=lstabile@concord.com \
--cc=sourcenav@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).