From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13145 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2002 18:34:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sourcenav-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: sourcenav-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13134 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2002 18:34:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO shell4.bayarea.net) (209.128.82.1) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Apr 2002 18:34:55 -0000 Received: from modrick (209-128-79-218.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.79.218]) by shell4.bayarea.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA12153 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:34:55 -0700 (envelope-from supermo@bayarea.net) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:34:00 -0000 From: Mo DeJong To: sourcenav Subject: Re: Upgrading TCL? Message-Id: <20020410033923.3b568a8a.supermo@bayarea.net> In-Reply-To: <26F9F6EAB586D411850700B0D049E6E401E11C9F@shasta.pdx.steptech.com> References: <26F9F6EAB586D411850700B0D049E6E401E11C9F@shasta.pdx.steptech.com> Organization: House of Mirth Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-q2/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:18:06 -0700 Chris Tavares wrote: > Has anyone tried to upgrade the copy of TCL shipped with Source Navigator > 5.0.0? I've run into a couple of things that look like interpreter bugs, and > I'm thinking that upgrading to the TCL 8.1.1 release might help things > (considering sourcenav is still shipping with 8.1b1). > > Has anyone tried this? Were there any problems? Are there any changes to the > TCL core done by sourcenav that I'd need to look out for? Hi Chris The Tcl 8.3 upgrade is about 97% done and can be checked out of the CVS at any time. This is the code that will be used for a new 5.1 release (when ready). There should be very few local changes to the SN Tcl 8.3 codebase except for the build system which includes a lot of local mods. cheers Mo DeJong