From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Syd Polk To: Berek Cc: sourcenav@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Source navigator roadmap, features list, etc.? Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 10:37:00 -0000 Message-id: <39D0DF9F.EB78FB38@redhat.com> References: <39D02D77.8060403@qeradiant.com> <002401c027df$68c47670$7113a8c0@concord.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-q3/msg00450.html The future is going to be dictated largely by the community. If a lot of people in the community want something in, we will make it a priority for development. Syd Polk Engineering Manager Berek wrote: > > I agree completely. I love SN, but it does have a lot of rough edges in the > UI, and it's buggy. I, too, have a lot of suggestions and bug reports and > would like to know what the future of SN is going to be > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Timothee Besset" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 01:00 > Subject: Source navigator roadmap, features list, etc.? > > > Is this list the only way to send feature suggestions and bug reports? > > What are the actual plans of RedHat with source navigator, is it going > > to evolve a lot more? Because I would have a truckload of improvement > > suggestions and feature requests. It would be nice if there was a public > > space somewhere that described who is doing what, maintaining what on > > this project. > > > > I had to move from an MSDev environment to development under linux, and > > Source Navigator does some things better than MSDev, but it also has > > some big drawbacks. > > > > regards > > > > TTimo > > > >