From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21970 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2001 22:40:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sourcenav-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: sourcenav-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21822 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2001 22:39:25 -0000 Message-ID: <3C0032A9.6EC96EDF@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 14:04:00 -0000 From: Ian Roxborough X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: William Gacquer CC: Roy Stephane-Y17548 , "'sourcenav@sources.redhat.com'" Subject: Re: Port of Source Navigator to Windows XP? References: <8DED8928257DD511B90F0008C7C5A4D034066E@QUB10EXM01.corp.mot.com> <3BFEAACA.93726963@redhat.com> <3C001842.6010309@laposte.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2001-q4/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 That would be "no" to: "Is there any plan to port Source Navigator to Windows XP." It doesn't mean that it's not going to happen. It doesn't mean no future Source Navigator development. Ian. William Gacquer wrote: > > Is the answer a no to the WindowsXP port or is this a no to the future > Source Navigator developments? > > Regards, > William > > Ian Roxborough wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >The short answer is probably no. > > > >The long answer involves either me finding > >a Windows XP machine and a bunch of time to > >do the port OR finding somebody who wants > >to port/maintain the Windows/Windows XP version. > > > >Ian. > >P.S.: What are the problems you are having? > > > >Roy Stephane-Y17548 wrote: > > > >>Hi, > >> > >>Is there any plan to port Source Navigator to Windows XP. Right now, 5.0 has some problem on Windows XP. > >> > >>Thanks and regards > >> > >>Stephane > >> > >