From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28355 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2002 21:11:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sourcenav-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: sourcenav-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28327 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2002 21:11:17 -0000 Message-ID: <3C3A0EF4.1050200@k-3d.com> Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 13:11:00 -0000 From: "Timothy M. Shead" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011221 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sourcenav@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: SourceNav release ... References: <20020105195420.47a9e61c.supermo@bayarea.net> <1010327798.1505.4.camel@mccallum> <3C39FF78.4040209@t-online.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-q1/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 Khamis Abuelkomboz wrote: > Hi Ralf, > > I find your input great. we need an "open" way to add work into SN, I > had the idea > about taking the current redhat SN and provide my own SN release, basicly > to rework the GUI and extend the existing parsers. > As example I would like > - to integrate the symbol browser into the main window, > - add more functionality to the browser, like add/remove files, history, > etc. > - making it possible to open more than one editor pane in a window. > - list the symbols of current edited file on the right (OLD SN > functionality reenabled) > - etc. > > Actually I already started to do this work, see > http://oimanager.de/sn/newsngui.gif > and welcome your input. > > But the problem is, where to keep the whole SN? My own web space is too > small. Sounds like SN ought to move to SourceForge - if Red Hat isn't going to maintain it, there needs to be a clean break, so people stop waiting for Red Hat to do the work ... which is not to complain about Red Hat - they're the ones who GPL'd SN, making such a move possible. Timothy M. Shead