From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24561 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2002 21:52:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sourcenav-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: sourcenav-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23957 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2002 21:52:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailout08.sul.t-online.com) (194.25.134.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Feb 2002 21:52:26 -0000 Received: from fwd01.sul.t-online.de by mailout08.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 16eNUg-0005U2-07; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 22:44:42 +0100 Received: from t-online.de (520027106440-0001@[217.80.164.101]) by fwd01.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 16eNUa-2KlhNwC; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 22:44:36 +0100 Message-ID: <3C76BC30.7080604@t-online.de> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:55:00 -0000 From: khamis2@t-online.de (Khamis Abuelkomboz) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sourcenav Subject: Re: New CVS module to checkout. References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sender: 520027106440-0001@t-dialin.net X-SW-Source: 2002-q1/txt/msg00119.txt.bz2 Hi, I didn't join you at the beginning of the discussion. SourceBase sounds good for me. I think, we must have the name of "Source-Navigator" into the new name for the database engine. This because Source-Navigator, as name, is famous now and people who look for SN tools would find SourceBase as a related theme. Think on Borland and Enprise history! Khamis Doug Fraser wrote: >Oh, I think sourcebase would be fine. >I really do. I was just thinking of something >more poetic, more artful. A library is what >you are building, in both senses. A linkable >library that acts as a backend to other development >tools and also a library as in sense 4 of the >American Heritage Dictionary: > > 4. An organized collection of recorded data > arranged for ease of use. > >but then, sourcebase is more descriptive. > >Alexandria would not immediately imply to the casual >web surfer that they had just encountered the neatest >source discovery tools anywhere in the solar system. >Sourcebase may just clue them in that direction.... > >Doug > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Eray Ozkural [mailto:erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr] >> > > > >>How about simply sticking with 'sourcebase'? Mo had said 'sourceDB'. >>sourcebase means a database of sources, a la knowledge base. >> >>Thanks, >> >>- -- >>Eray Ozkural (exa) >> > >