From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22386 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2002 23:13:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sourcenav-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: sourcenav-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22377 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2002 23:13:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailout04.sul.t-online.com) (194.25.134.18) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2002 23:13:30 -0000 Received: from fwd06.sul.t-online.de by mailout04.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 16uLqd-00027k-02; Mon, 08 Apr 2002 01:13:23 +0200 Received: from t-online.de (520027106440-0001@[212.185.239.60]) by fwd06.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 16uLqT-0Fd2LgC; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 01:13:13 +0200 Message-ID: <3CB0D2A8.7020605@t-online.de> Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2002 16:13:00 -0000 From: khamis2@t-online.de (Khamis Abuelkomboz) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: irox@sbcglobal.net CC: sourcenav@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Back online... References: <20020406123236.6aae8802.irox@sbcglobal.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sender: 520027106440-0001@t-dialin.net X-SW-Source: 2002-q2/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2 Hi Ian, welcome you back. hopefully you enjoy the time in santa cruz. Since you left redhat, is there anybody who still deal with SN in redhat (Mo)? As you see, I packaged all my stuff and released SN50E. It contains the bug fixes, parsers and the gui rework to SN50. I think, this is a good base to start from. We kann put all the stuff on SourceForge and continue developing SN. This in relation with the question, if redhat will allow us to have access to the SN-cvs tree? The CVS Tree contains Tcl/Tk8.3 and SN50 is released with Tcl/Tk8.1. My question here, do we need to always upgrade to the newest tcl/tk release? Because upgrading takes the most time and since we do not have alot of time to work on SN, the benefit will go to improve SN. Khamis irox@sbcglobal.net wrote: >Hi all, > >Sorry about my unannounced absence for the last month >or so. I no longer work for Red Hat and I moved to >Santa Cruz, then had to fight with SBC to turn on my >DSL line (the longest block of time I gone without >internet access since the early 90s...). > > >The first thing I'd like to talk about is Copyright >assignments. While I was still working for RH I >brought the idea of making Source-Navigator a >multi-copyright holder project to as many people in >RH as I could. This would mean people who contribute >code to Source-Navigator don't have to sign over thier >copyrights to Red Hat. I was never able to get a firm >yes or no from anybody, but I would like to implement >this (long over due) change anyway. > > >What's happening with "libSN" (or whatever it was called)? >I'd prefer to wait until there is something to show before >creating a CVS modules for it. > > >Anyway, with contributions from Khamis, Mo and myself >we should be able turn out a new SN release. At somepoint >I'll go over the last month or so of the mailing list and >apply any patches I've missed, reply to any interesting >emails, etc.. > >Thanks for your patience, >and a big thanks to everybody who answered email >on this list over the last month. :-) > >Ian. > > -- -- Dipl.-Informatiker Khamis Abuelkomboz Rosenweg 124 58239 Schwerte +49 2304 898560 (Telefon) +49 2304 898561 (Fax) http://khamis.oimanager.de