public inbox for sourcenav@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randall R Schulz <rrschulz@cris.com>
To: "Emilio Riva" <Emilio.Riva@marconi.com>, sourcenav@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Sorry, but... this project is still alive?
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 08:29:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20020411082728.027e8a48@pop3.cris.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFEB4C67B6.B80BFBDA-ONC1256B98.002EFD1E@uk.marconicomms.co m>

At 01:56 2002-04-11, Emilio Riva wrote:
>It's a lot of time that Source Navigator development seems to be stopped 
>(no new releases, no news): are you still working on it? I've only found a 
>SourceForge project to extend the graphic interface... There are a lot of 
>little problems with actual release of snavigator: Project Editor don't 
>work correctly, the cross-reference functionality hangs frequently with 
>big project trees, it's not easy to extend syntax (i.e. like in vim or 
>scintilla text editor)... And what about adding doxygen/javadoc extended 
>comment support? And an easier way to extend user menu, configuration 
>tools,...? And a better support for teams of developers working on the 
>same project tree and on the same (big) server? I mean, in this case the 
>cross reference database should be shared, not duplicated for every 
>developer...
>
>I think that snavigator is a great tool, and I hope you'll find the time 
>to continue it's development and optimization.
>
>thank you,
>Emilio Riva



Emilio,

I don't think that's accurate. This message is only a couple of weeks old:

>Sender: sourcenav-owner@sources.redhat.com
>Message-ID: <3C9E5B3E.1080409@gmx.de>
>Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 00:03:26 +0100
>From: khamis2@t-online.de (Khamis Abuelkomboz)
>To: sourcenav@sources.redhat.com
>Subject: Source-Navigator 5.0E for Redhat 7.2
>
>Hi All,
>
>I built a good Source-Navigator Release including many bug fixes and a new 
>design for the gui. You would be able to add/remove files from the browser 
>and edit more than one file in a window. It's a clean and good release. I 
>named the release SN5.0E, what means a a sn release including the 
>extensions of www.oimanger.de
>
>Actually I have had so few time to get this work done. a release for 
>windows and the packaged source code are coming soon.
>
>download the binary package from
>
>
>http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/sn-extensions/SN50E-020324-redhat7.2.tar.gz
>
>khamis


Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA

       reply	other threads:[~2002-04-11 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <OFEB4C67B6.B80BFBDA-ONC1256B98.002EFD1E@uk.marconicomms.co m>
2002-04-11  8:29 ` Randall R Schulz [this message]
2002-04-12  7:19 Left Spin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-12  0:16 Emilio Riva
2002-04-12  0:03 Emilio Riva
2002-04-11  2:45 Emilio Riva
2002-04-11  8:49 ` irox
2002-04-11  9:25 ` Bill Brune
2002-04-11 13:53 ` Khamis Abuelkomboz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5.1.0.14.2.20020411082728.027e8a48@pop3.cris.com \
    --to=rrschulz@cris.com \
    --cc=Emilio.Riva@marconi.com \
    --cc=sourcenav@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).