Re: cross references of static functions

[alex.shneer@verizon.com]

Can you think of any possible workarounds or patches for 4.5.2 that could
solve this or will it be fixed in the next version?

There are similar scope management problems in the COBOL parser.
I thought to borrow ideas from C++ parser to patch the cobol parser: no
luck here, obviously.





Ian Roxborough <irox@redhat.com> on 01/10/2001 04:23:01 PM

To:   alex.shneer@verizon.com
cc:   sourcenav@sources.redhat.com
Subject:  Re: cross references of static functions





This sounds like bad scope management.  One of the many parser
problems that needs to be solved.  Once we add support for things
like namespaces and innerclasses, we should have way better scope
management (well, really we need to improve scope management
inorder to add namespace and innerclass support).

Ian.


alex.shneer@verizon.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
> can anybody tell why cross reference window shows that both func1 and
func2
>  are referenced by static_func,
> no matter wich one we choose: one defined in the static1.c or one defined
> in static2.c?
>
> static1.c:
> --------------------------------------
> static static_func()
> {
>    func1();
> }
> --------------------------------------
> static2.c
> --------------------------------------
> static static_func ()
> {
>    func2();
> }
> ---------------------------------------