From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30299 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2002 00:16:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sourcenav-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: sourcenav-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30184 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2002 00:16:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gash2.peakpeak.com) (207.174.178.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Feb 2002 00:16:25 -0000 Received: from creche.cygnus.com (ta0201.peakpeak.com [204.144.244.201]) by gash2.peakpeak.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA15997; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 17:16:18 -0700 Received: (from tromey@localhost) by creche.cygnus.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA24044; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 17:41:54 -0700 To: Mo DeJong Cc: sourcenav Subject: Re: No grep module? References: <20020222155242.249517de.supermo@bayarea.net> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom X-Zippy: YOU!! Give me the CUTEST, PINKEST, most charming little VICTORIAN DOLLHOUSE you can find!! An make it SNAPPY!! Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 15:35:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Mo DeJong's message of "Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:52:42 -0800" Message-ID: <878z9lowq5.fsf@creche.redhat.com> X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.5 X-SW-Source: 2002-q1/txt/msg00123.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Mo" == Mo DeJong writes: Mo> If we do want to add a grep module to support building under Mo> Windows, then perhaps we need to upgrade to a more recent version Mo> of GNU grep. I think we removed all the old custom grep hacks that Mo> we were using, so we should be able to upgrade. What about hacking S-N to load files and do its own regexp matching, thus avoiding the need for a separate grep executable? I think in the past grep was used for better performance. Is it really that significant? Tom