From: "Berek Half-hand" <berek@usa.net>
To: "Mo DeJong" <mdejong@cygnus.com>, <sourcenav@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: RE: Source Navigator 5 and Red Hat 7.1
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 14:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <NFBBLPGOFICNAFDHEABHMEEICDAA.berek@usa.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1010703121618.1311B-100000@cse.cygnus.com>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2051 bytes --]
Title:
Mo, just started work at Unisphere Networks in Westford Mass.
Code base at old place of work was all C++. Lots of parser and xref problems;
you probably remember some of my email. New job all JAVA. Dbimp croaks, can't
build xref, etc. My experience with SN is that it can't parse or build xref's
for anything but the simplest of standard C code bases. It doesn't parse C++ or
Java in any of the last three places I've worked at. And no, I can't let you
have any of the code bases (they don't belong to me). No, I can't afford to pay
Redstone to fix these problems (I paid $500 for SN 4.5.1 one month before it
went public domain, and I sort of figured bug fixing and maintenance were part
of what I paid for). No, I can't fix these problems myself; I spend all of my
time (50-60 hrs/week) bringing home a paycheck.
So...instead of talking about code base search and replace, why
doesn't someone at RedHat fix some of these serious problems? I haven't been
able to get an xref of any code base in any language (except a simple std C grep
I wrote years ago) for over three years. Pardon my frustration, but I really
wish I had my money back. Any chance of that?
-----Original
Message----- From: sourcenav-owner@sources.redhat.com [ mailto:sourcenav-owner@sources.redhat.com ]On
Behalf Of Mo DeJong Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 3:17 PM To:
sourcenav@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Source Navigator 5 and Red Hat
7.1 On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Tom Davis wrote: >
Hello, > > I'm having a bit of trouble installing source navigator 5
on my redhat box. > The compile fails because I don't have Tix
version 4.1.8.1 installed, but > instead have version 4.1.0.6-53
installed. > > I have tried the tix website (somewhere on the
sourceforge site), but can't > see this version, only version 8 and
above. Has anyone got any suggestions > to get round
this? This should not matter. SN builds itself with all the needed
software in the tree. When you download the source code, all the needed
packages are included. Mo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-03 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-01 9:19 Tom Davis
2001-07-03 12:17 ` Mo DeJong
2001-07-03 14:44 ` Berek Half-hand [this message]
2001-07-03 15:27 ` Mo DeJong
2001-07-15 17:52 Mike Clarkson
2001-07-16 10:56 ` Mo DeJong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=NFBBLPGOFICNAFDHEABHMEEICDAA.berek@usa.net \
--to=berek@usa.net \
--cc=mdejong@cygnus.com \
--cc=sourcenav@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).