From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Elliston <bje@redhat.com>
To: Syd Polk <spolk@redhat.com>
Cc: Mo DeJong <mdejong@cygnus.com>, <sourcenav@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Adding Ruby support to Source Navigator
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:11:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0011140910270.31422-100000@moshpit.cygnus.com>
References: <3A101BE4.129FADE4@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2000-q4/msg00223.html

   > I'm trying to decide whether all libraries matching a specific pattern (say,
   > "*high*.so" should be loaded, or whether they should be named explicitly in
   > the configuration file.  Thoughts?

   Hmm. I hate configuration files. I would vote for a pattern.
   Something like:
   sn*high*.so on unix
   and
   sn*high*.dll on windows.

What about the problems whereby users get confused by implict behaviour?
I have implicit behaviour. :-)

Ben