From: "Gui,Jian" <guij@cn.ibm.com>
To: "Martin Hunt" <hunt@redhat.com>,
"SystemTAP" <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: [patch] ppc64 patch for new benchmark framework
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001e01c64f2f$05dc51e0$9d85b509@IBM528414E28E4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1142416360.27792.8.camel@dragon>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3400 bytes --]
Hi, Martin
This patch is to fix three maybe bugs of the new benchmark framework
on ppc64.
This framework works fine on i686 but fails on my ppc64/2.6.9-34.EL
for the following reasons:
1) The function kallsyms_lookup_name("sys_getuid") always return 0
on ppc64 and we have to use kallsysms_lookup_name(".sys_getuid")
to get the function entry address instead;
2) The content of /proc/cpuinfo on ppc64 is different from on i686.
It is like:
processor : 0
cpu : POWER5 (gr)
clock : 1502.496000MHz
revision : 2.2
There is no "model name" or "physical id" information, thus current
print_header always failed;
3) The assignment of (.addr = "sys_getuid") will trigger a compilation
error like: "warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type"
(I'm using gcc-3.4.5-2 + glibc-2.3.4-2.19)
This patch works on ppc64/2.6.9-34.EL and i686/2.6.15.6 and should
apply to snapshot-20060318.
Could you give some comments? Thanks.
Gui,Jian
diff -Nur src-20060318/runtime/bench2/bench.rb
src-modified/runtime/bench2/bench.rb
--- src-20060318/runtime/bench2/bench.rb 2006-03-24
09:03:53.000000000 -0500
+++ src-modified/runtime/bench2/bench.rb 2006-03-24
09:06:26.000000000 -0500
@@ -149,9 +149,14 @@
MODULE_AUTHOR(\"automatically generated by bench2/run_bench\");\n\n"
f << "static int inst_sys_getuid (struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs
*regs) {\n"
f << @code
- f << "\n return 0;\n}
-static struct kprobe kp[] = {\n {\n .addr = \"sys_getuid\",
- .pre_handler = inst_sys_getuid\n }\n};\n
+ f << "\n return 0;\n}\n"
+ f << " static struct kprobe kp[] = {\n {\n"
+ f << "#if defined __powerpc64__ \n"
+ f << " .addr = (void *)\".sys_getuid\",\n"
+ f << "#else \n"
+ f << " .addr = \"sys_getuid\", \n"
+ f << "#endif\n"
+ f << ".pre_handler = inst_sys_getuid\n }\n};\n
#define NUM_KPROBES 1\n
int probe_start(void)\n{\n return _stp_register_kprobes (kp,
NUM_KPROBES);\n}\n
void probe_exit (void)\n{\n _stp_unregister_kprobes (kp, NUM_KPROBES);
\n}\n"
@@ -185,8 +190,17 @@
else
@@num_threads = [1]
end
- physical_cpus=`grep "physical id"
/proc/cpuinfo`.split("\n").uniq.length
- model=`grep "model name" /proc/cpuinfo`.match(/(model
name\t: )([^\n]*)/)[2]
+ arch=`uname -m`.strip
+ if (arch.match(/ppc64/))
+ cpu=`grep "cpu" /proc/cpuinfo`.match(/(cpu\t\t: )([^\n]*)/)[2]
+ clock=`grep "clock" /proc/cpuinfo`.match(/(clock\t\t: )([^\n]*)/)[2]
+ revision=`grep "revision"
/proc/cpuinfo`.match(/(revision\t: )([^\n]*)/)[2]
+ cpuinfo=cpu + " " + clock + " revision: " + revision
+ else
+ physical_cpus=`grep "physical id"
/proc/cpuinfo`.split("\n").uniq.length
+ model=`grep "model name" /proc/cpuinfo`.match(/(model
name\t: )([^\n]*)/)[2]
+ cpuinfo="(#{physical_cpus} physical) #{model}"
+ end
puts "SystemTap BENCH2 \t" + `date`
puts "kernel: " + `uname -r`.strip + " " + `uname -m`.strip
begin
@@ -195,11 +209,7 @@
end
puts `uname -n`.strip + ": " + `uptime`
- if nproc > 1
- puts "processors: #{nproc} (#{physical_cpus} physical) #{model}"
- else
- puts "processors: #{nproc} #{model}"
- end
+ puts "processors: #{nproc} #{cpuinfo}"
begin
mem=IO.read("/proc/meminfo").split("\n")
[-- Attachment #2: bench2.ppc64.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 2326 bytes --]
diff -Nur src-20060318/runtime/bench2/bench.rb src-modified/runtime/bench2/bench.rb
--- src-20060318/runtime/bench2/bench.rb 2006-03-24 09:03:53.000000000 -0500
+++ src-modified/runtime/bench2/bench.rb 2006-03-24 09:06:26.000000000 -0500
@@ -149,9 +149,14 @@
MODULE_AUTHOR(\"automatically generated by bench2/run_bench\");\n\n"
f << "static int inst_sys_getuid (struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs) {\n"
f << @code
- f << "\n return 0;\n}
-static struct kprobe kp[] = {\n {\n .addr = \"sys_getuid\",
- .pre_handler = inst_sys_getuid\n }\n};\n
+ f << "\n return 0;\n}\n"
+ f << " static struct kprobe kp[] = {\n {\n"
+ f << "#if defined __powerpc64__ \n"
+ f << " .addr = (void *)\".sys_getuid\",\n"
+ f << "#else \n"
+ f << " .addr = \"sys_getuid\", \n"
+ f << "#endif\n"
+ f << ".pre_handler = inst_sys_getuid\n }\n};\n
#define NUM_KPROBES 1\n
int probe_start(void)\n{\n return _stp_register_kprobes (kp, NUM_KPROBES);\n}\n
void probe_exit (void)\n{\n _stp_unregister_kprobes (kp, NUM_KPROBES); \n}\n"
@@ -185,8 +190,17 @@
else
@@num_threads = [1]
end
- physical_cpus=`grep "physical id" /proc/cpuinfo`.split("\n").uniq.length
- model=`grep "model name" /proc/cpuinfo`.match(/(model name\t: )([^\n]*)/)[2]
+ arch=`uname -m`.strip
+ if (arch.match(/ppc64/))
+ cpu=`grep "cpu" /proc/cpuinfo`.match(/(cpu\t\t: )([^\n]*)/)[2]
+ clock=`grep "clock" /proc/cpuinfo`.match(/(clock\t\t: )([^\n]*)/)[2]
+ revision=`grep "revision" /proc/cpuinfo`.match(/(revision\t: )([^\n]*)/)[2]
+ cpuinfo=cpu + " " + clock + " revision: " + revision
+ else
+ physical_cpus=`grep "physical id" /proc/cpuinfo`.split("\n").uniq.length
+ model=`grep "model name" /proc/cpuinfo`.match(/(model name\t: )([^\n]*)/)[2]
+ cpuinfo="(#{physical_cpus} physical) #{model}"
+ end
puts "SystemTap BENCH2 \t" + `date`
puts "kernel: " + `uname -r`.strip + " " + `uname -m`.strip
begin
@@ -195,11 +209,7 @@
end
puts `uname -n`.strip + ": " + `uptime`
- if nproc > 1
- puts "processors: #{nproc} (#{physical_cpus} physical) #{model}"
- else
- puts "processors: #{nproc} #{model}"
- end
+ puts "processors: #{nproc} #{cpuinfo}"
begin
mem=IO.read("/proc/meminfo").split("\n")
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-24 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-15 9:52 Martin Hunt
2006-03-24 10:38 ` Gui,Jian [this message]
2006-03-24 18:47 ` [patch] ppc64 patch for " Martin Hunt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001e01c64f2f$05dc51e0$9d85b509@IBM528414E28E4' \
--to=guij@cn.ibm.com \
--cc=hunt@redhat.com \
--cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).