Re: glibc build failure due to Systemtap probe change

[Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com>]

On 25/11/2021 02:55, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> Hi, On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 04:47, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
> <libc-alpha@sourceware.org> wrote: * Stan Cox: >> Is there a way way to
> use STAP_PROBE_ASM without supplying the template? >> There's no type
> inspection in ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
> This Message Is From an External Sender
> This message came from outside your organization.
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 04:47, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
> <libc-alpha@sourceware.org <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>> wrote:
> 
>     * Stan Cox:
> 
>     >> Is there a way way to use STAP_PROBE_ASM without supplying the
>     template?
>     >> There's no type inspection in assembler, after all.
>     >
>     > Can you send me the failing .i file so I can experiment with it?
> 
>     --save-temps did not work for me for some reason, so I'm attaching -E
>     and -E -fdirectives-only output.
> 
>     I think I got Fedora rawhide s390x building again, so it's not *very*
>     time-critical, but I really don't want to release Fedora 36 with our own
>     private copy of <sys/sdt.h>.  But that release still some months away.
> 
> 
> Is there any update on this? I just ran into it with my snapshot build
> for Ubuntu. I can borrow/steal Florian's fix for now too but I too would
> prefer not to release 22.04 with it...
> 
> Cheers,
> mwh 

As information: This also happens on Fedora 35 with
systemtap-sdt-devel-4.6-1.fc35.

@Stan: Do you have any news with your experiments?

Bye,
Stefan