From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10156 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2008 11:35:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 10149 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Oct 2008 11:35:06 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_MX,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:34:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9OBYT7W021272 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:34:29 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m9OBYSGn015738 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:34:28 -0400 Received: from [10.32.4.142] (vpn-4-142.str.redhat.com [10.32.4.142]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9OBYRFE005152; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:34:27 -0400 Subject: Re: Labrat reports for 2.6.27-RC snapshot tests From: Mark Wielaard To: wenji.huang@oracle.com Cc: SystemTAP , "ZANNONI,ELENA" , "VAN HEES,KRIS" In-Reply-To: <490172AA.2000605@oracle.com> References: <490172AA.2000605@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:35:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1224848066.3418.20.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254 Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q4/txt/msg00197.txt.bz2 Hi Wenji, On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 15:00 +0800, Wenji Huang wrote: > In the future, we will do the same thing on 2.6.28-RC and find the > possible regression. This is useful. Thanks. If you could post such an overview whenever a new rc comes out for 2.6.28 that would be really helpful. There is some noise in the output because the script seems to not understand some of the error messages when things fail. e.g. FAIL -> N/A test - systemtap.samples/gtod.exp(gtod (0)) [...] N/A -> PASS test - systemtap.samples/gtod.exp(gtod (300)) It would be useful to keep either the kernel version or the systemtap snapshot version constant between runs. It looks like currently both are updated at the same time. Although it isn't completely clear, the version is always reported as 0.7.1, it would be good to mention the last git commit (as in stap -V). Still, having this automated is much better than how I currently do it by hand and then just grep through the log files to see what happened. Do you have an overview "base run" against 2.6.27 final? Thanks, Mark