From: Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Cc: William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>,
SystemTAP <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: New Systemtap-0.8 RPM available for testing on Fedora 8 and Fedora 9
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1227189973.3306.29.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <y0mprkqfuux.fsf@ton.toronto.redhat.com>
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 07:24 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> mjw wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > I couldn't figure out how to run the tests against the
> > systemtap-testsuite package. Would like to run those to see how things
> > look in the larger picture. How do you run them from the rpm?
>
> Install systemtap-testsuite rpm. cd /usr/share/systemtap*/testsuite.
> make *check.
Doh. That was too easy. Should have figured that out myself.
Results of sudo make installcheck look good:
Host: Linux dijkstra.wildebeest.org 2.6.27.5-41.fc9.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu
Nov 13 20:29:07 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Snapshot: version 0.8/0.137 non-git sources
Distro: Fedora release 9 (Sulphur)
=== systemtap Summary ===
# of expected passes 638
# of unexpected failures 11
# of unexpected successes 9
# of expected failures 199
# of known failures 7
# of untested testcases 4
# of unsupported tests 2
Where the failures are:
FAIL: systemtap.examples/process/sig_by_pid build
FAIL: systemtap.examples/process/sig_by_pid run
FAIL: systemtap.examples/process/sig_by_proc build
FAIL: systemtap.examples/process/sig_by_proc run
FAIL: systemtap.examples/process/sigkill build
FAIL: systemtap.examples/process/sigkill run
FAIL: systemtap.examples/process/sigmon build
FAIL: systemtap.examples/process/sigmon run
FAIL: buildok/signal-all-probes.stp
- These are all http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7030
"signal tapset may be referring to inline functions"
(which has a patch attached)
FAIL: gtod (200)
- Still need to investigate.
FAIL: 32-bit net1
- This is http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6991
"accept system call missed on 2.6.27"
I have given it a thumbs up at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9695
(where I saw Will already posted the above results...)
Cheers,
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-20 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-19 19:42 William Cohen
2008-11-20 11:32 ` Mark Wielaard
2008-11-20 12:25 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-11-20 14:07 ` Mark Wielaard [this message]
2008-11-20 14:35 ` William Cohen
2008-11-20 15:31 ` William Cohen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1227189973.3306.29.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org \
--to=mjw@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).